Here is the latest Caml Weekly News, for the week of 10 to 17 February, 2004.
> I'm writing a function that is using an array that can be dynamically > resized. I'm wondering if it would be better to just catch an exception > if we attempt to go out of bounds in the array (at which point I resize > the array), or if I should test the size using an if-then-else before I > enter the main body of my function and resize then. You might be interested in the RES-library, which also implements resizable arrays while staying compatible to the Array-module: http://www.oefai.at/~markus/home/ocaml_sources.html#RES Bounds checking probably makes less difference to the performance of your algorithm than you might expect.
Here is a quick trick to help you read this CWN if you are viewing it using vim (version 6 or greater).
If you know of a better way, please let me know.
If you happen to miss a CWN, you can send me a message and I'll mail it to you, or go take a look at the archive or the RSS feed of the archives.
If you also wish to receive it every week by mail, you may subscribe online.